Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757607AbZDXKlt (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:41:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752423AbZDXKlh (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:41:37 -0400 Received: from astoria.ccjclearline.com ([64.235.106.9]:41664 "EHLO astoria.ccjclearline.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752035AbZDXKlh (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:41:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:40:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@localhost.localdomain To: Andrew Morton cc: David Daney , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce a boolean "single_bit_set" function. In-Reply-To: <20090423165723.16c9f566.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <49F0C817.8050407@caviumnetworks.com> <20090423165723.16c9f566.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - astoria.ccjclearline.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - crashcourse.ca X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2119 Lines: 70 On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:57:11 -0700 > David Daney wrote: > > > > +static inline __attribute__((const)) > > > +bool single_bit_set(unsigned long n) > > > +{ > > > + return (n != 0 && ((n & (n - 1)) == 0)); > > > +} > > > + > > > + > > > > > > It would be nice to be able to override this per architecture. > > > > For example a more efficient implementation on CPUs that have a > > population count instruction (__builtin_popcountl()) might be: > > > > static inline __attribute__((const)) > > bool singe_bit_set(unsigned long n) > > { > > return __builtin_popcountl(n) == 1; > > } > > Already done, via hweight_long(). so it would be a simple matter to define the bit set boolean in terms of hweight_long(), yes? so what about, in bitops.h: static inline bool exactly_one_bit_set(unsigned long w) { return hweight_long(w) == 1; } static inline bool more_than_one_bit_set(unsigned long w) { return hweight_long(w) > 1; } or something to that effect, *if* people think it's worth it. obviously, none of the above is strictly necessary, but it would make a lot of code semantically cleaner. rday p.s. i notice that, even in a single header file like bitops.h, there is a mixture of both "inline" and "__inline__". what's the recommended choice these days? -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/