Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 14:50:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 14:50:12 -0500 Received: from hq.fsmlabs.com ([209.155.42.197]:8716 "EHLO hq.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 14:49:57 -0500 From: Cort Dougan Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 12:49:07 -0700 To: Alexander Viro Cc: Erik Mouw , Daniel Phillips , Alan Cox , Val Henson , "Randy.Dunlap" , Laurent , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: read_proc issue Message-ID: <20020301124907.H31407@host110.fsmlabs.com> In-Reply-To: <20020301071410.GA11256@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from viro@math.psu.edu on Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 02:47:26AM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yes, please kill it! seq files are much better and don't give people as much of a chance to do things the wrong way. Fewer interfaces to /proc would be vast improvement. } Oh, for fsck sake... } } We already have better mechanism. Let ->proc_read() die, it's an ugly } kludge, breeding overcomplicated code and buffer overflows. } } - } To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in } the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org } More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html } Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/