Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754393AbZDYQH0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:07:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753182AbZDYQHL (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:07:11 -0400 Received: from rcpt-expgw.biglobe.ne.jp ([133.205.19.67]:41858 "EHLO rcpt-expgw.biglobe.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752786AbZDYQHK (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:07:10 -0400 X-Biglobe-Sender: Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:06:58 +0900 From: Daisuke Nishimura To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "hugh@veritas.com" , d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp, Daisuke Nishimura Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix swap entries is not reclaimed in proper way for memg v3. Message-Id: <20090426010658.c0fa3258.d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20090425215459.5cab7285.d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp> References: <20090421162121.1a1d15fe.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090422143833.2e11e10b.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20090424133306.0d9fb2ce.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090424152103.a5ee8d13.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20090424162840.2ad06d8a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090425215459.5cab7285.d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp> Reply-To: nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0rc2 (GTK+ 2.12.12; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1679 Lines: 64 A few minor nitpicks :) > > +static void memcg_fixup_stale_swapcache(struct work_struct *work) > > +{ > > + int pos = 0; > > + swp_entry_t entry; > > + struct page *page; > > + int forget, ret; > > + > > + while (ssc.num) { > > + spin_lock(&ssc.lock); > > + pos = find_next_bit(ssc.usemap, STALE_ENTS, pos); > > + spin_unlock(&ssc.lock); > > + > > + if (pos >= STALE_ENTS) > > + break; > > + > > + entry = ssc.ents[pos]; > > + > > + forget = 1; > > + page = lookup_swap_cache(entry); I think using find_get_page() would be better. lookup_swap_cache() update swapcache_info. > > + if (page) { > > + lock_page(page); > > + ret = try_to_free_swap(page); > > + /* If it's still under I/O, don't forget it */ > > + if (!ret && PageWriteback(page)) > > + forget = 0; > > + unlock_page(page); > I think we need page_cache_release(). > lookup_swap_cache() gets the page. > > > + } > > + if (forget) { > > + spin_lock(&ssc.lock); > > + clear_bit(pos, ssc.usemap); > > + ssc.num--; > > + if (ssc.num < STALE_ENTS/2) > > + ssc.congestion = 0; > > + spin_unlock(&ssc.lock); > > + } > > + pos++; > > + } > > + if (ssc.num) /* schedule me again */ > > + schedule_delayed_work(&ssc.gc_work, HZ/10); We can use schedule_ssc_gc() here. (It should be defined before this, of course. And can be inlined.) > "if (ssc.congestion)" would be better ? > > > + return; > > +} > > + > Thanks, Daisuke Nishimura. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/