Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754067AbZDYRbH (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:31:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752706AbZDYRav (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:30:51 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:39153 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752880AbZDYRav (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:30:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:25:24 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: David Howells Cc: Roland McGrath , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morris , Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: ptrace && cred_exec_mutex (Was: [PATCH] ptrace: tracehook_unsafe_exec: remove the stale comment) Message-ID: <20090425172524.GA3432@redhat.com> References: <20090424163949.GA12035@redhat.com> <20090423212250.GA22537@redhat.com> <20090423232717.975ABFC3C7@magilla.sf.frob.com> <31842.1240656853@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <31842.1240656853@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1243 Lines: 45 On 04/25, David Howells wrote: > > Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > Yes. Except it looks like ->cred_exec_mutex is never used in fact. > > I must to be missing something... I see that: > > int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task) > { > ... > /* Protect exec's credential calculations against our interference; > * SUID, SGID and LSM creds get determined differently under ptrace. > */ > retval = mutex_lock_interruptible(¤t->cred_exec_mutex); > ... > } > > And: > > int do_execve(...) > { > ... > retval = mutex_lock_interruptible(¤t->cred_exec_mutex); > if (retval < 0) > goto out_free; > ... > } Sorry David, I was very unclear. These 2 current's are different tasks, and hence we take to unrelated locks. We can never block taking current->cred_exec_mutex because nobody else touches this mutex, we always use current. This means this lock is "nop". Unless I missed something, ptrace_attach() should take task->cred_exec_mutex. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/