Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:37:40 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Tim Abbott <tabbott@MIT.EDU>,
       Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Anders Kaseorg <andersk@MIT.EDU>, Waseem Daher <wdaher@MIT.EDU>,
       Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
       Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
       "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
       Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Jeff Arnold <jbarnold@MIT.EDU>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
       Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>,
       Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>,
       Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
       Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
       =?iso-8859-1?Q?Am=E9rico?= Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
       Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>,
       David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
       Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86: convert to use __HEAD and HEAD_TEXT macros.
Message-ID: <20090427073740.GA7375@uranus.ravnborg.org>
References: <1240711870-30505-13-git-send-email-tabbott@mit.edu> <1240711870-30505-14-git-send-email-tabbott@mit.edu> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904260934570.3101@localhost.localdomain> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904260958190.3101@localhost.localdomain> <20090426183401.GA1622@uranus.ravnborg.org> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904261146570.7331@localhost.localdomain> <20090426192317.GA2637@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20090427045910.GA11868@elte.hu> <20090427064216.GA6918@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20090427071902.GA6047@elte.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090427071902.GA6047@elte.hu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 797
Lines: 24

> >
> > The good patches are the ones that benefits all architectures.
> 
> The good patches are the ones that increase the quality of the 
> kernel and benefit people.

Should have read "the good kbuild patches" - it did not address
patches in general.

> > I noticed a few minor things that can be 'fixed' to bring the inital
> > differences between 32 bit and 64 bit down.
> > 
> > But I can do these in a follow-up patch too.
> 
> Yeah, please do a follow-up patch - unless the first patch is 
> outright wrong.
A follow-up patch it will be.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/