Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 22:33:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 22:33:00 -0500 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:4446 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 22:32:58 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 04:30:25 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Alan Cox Cc: Bill Davidsen , Mike Fedyk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.19pre1aa1 Message-ID: <20020302043025.R4431@inspiron.random> In-Reply-To: <20020302030615.G4431@inspiron.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 02:28:20AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > On a very lowmem machine the rmap design shouldn't really make a sensible > > difference, the smaller the amount of mapped VM, the less rmap can make > > differences, period. > > It makes a big big difference on a low memory box. Try running xfce on > a 24Mb box with the base 2.4.18, 2.4.18 + rmap12f and 2.4.18+aa. Thats > a case where aa definitely loses and without other I/O patches being hmm to fully evaluate this I'd need to have access to the exact two kernel source tarballs that you compared (a diff against a known vanilla kernel tree would be fine) and to know the way you measured the difference of them while xfce was running (nominal performance/responsiveness/whatever?). Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/