Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 23:11:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 23:11:16 -0500 Received: from cdserv.meridian-data.com ([206.79.177.152]:54286 "EHLO nasexs1.meridian-data.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 23:11:00 -0500 Message-ID: <2D0AFEFEE711D611923E009027D39F2B153ADF@cdserv.meridian-data.com> From: "Dennis, Jim" To: "'Stephen Degler'" , Marcelo Tosatti Cc: "Dennis, Jim" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: RE: Congrats Marcelo, Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 20:13:37 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen. Seen M lately? > Hi, > FYI crypto is included in (Net|Free|Open)BSD source releases and I don't > believe it is an issue for them. > skd OpenBSD is maintained in Canada. IIRC the FreeBSD IPSec patches started in Japan, but I guess they have been merged into the mainstream. I don't know about NetBSD. However, the point is well taken. If our *BSD freeware OS' have been successfully shipping with IPSec and other advanced crypto, from the U.S. outbound than it's a precedent we may be able to follow. Also the Debian project seems to be moving in that direction (including crypto in their mainstream distro). Obviously I opened a can of worms with my question. I just wanted to know when the unofficial patches would be sync with 2.4.18 (so I could fetch and apply them without having to wrangle addition .rej files; since I a number of local patches to apply and wrangle *their* rejects is enough work already). Clearly there's alot of pent up demand to include more stuff in the mainstream. I can understand Marcelo's conservatism (and Linus'). So the various branch trees that are popping up. This latest one by Jorg Prante (sorry of the the lack of proper diacriticals) is a nice base, with XFS, rmap, Ingo's O(1) scheduler, KLIPS and patch-int, and quite a few others. It isn't as outrageous as FOLK and it uses the GR (getrewted) patches rather than LIDS. However, as I say, it's a nice base for someone who wants to be a few steps off the mainstream. > On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 06:52:25PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Dennis, Jim wrote: >> Marcelo, >> >> Contratulations on your first "official" kernel release. It seems to >> have gone >> well (except for some complaints on slashdot about -rc4 SPARC patches >> missing from >> the patch, but apparently in the full tarball). >> >> Now I need to know about the status of several unofficial patches: >> >> XFS > Want to see stable in -ac first. >> LVM > Its on 2.4 already. >> i2c >> Crypto >> FreeS/WAN KLIPS >> LIDS > I think its not possible to distribute crypto stuff in the stock kernel. > Am I wrong? >> rmap > I need to see it running in production for more time. >> Marcelo, there were some i2c updates included in the lmsensors package, >> have they >> submitted those to you for integration into 2.4.19? > Nope. I could well integrate lm_sensors in the future. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/