Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:03:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:03:12 -0400 Received: from neon-gw.transmeta.com ([209.10.217.66]:4367 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:03:01 -0400 Message-ID: <39F9DF5F.F5E6E4B8@transmeta.com> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:02:39 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Organization: Transmeta Corporation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test10-pre3 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, sv, no, da, es, fr, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Horst von Brand CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu detection fixes for test10-pre4 In-Reply-To: <200010271946.e9RJk6K01211@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Horst von Brand wrote: > > "H. Peter Anvin" said: > > Alan Cox wrote: > > [...] > > > > > We should never have used anything but "i386" as the utsname... sigh. > > > > Its questionable if we should include the 'i' > > > True enough, personally I prefer "x86". > > ia32 is the official name. OTOH, i[3-6]86 _are_ different beasts... > IA32 is a retcon, and is used only by Intel anyway. There are differences between the i686 lines that are significantly bigger than between the i486 and i586, and that doesn't even begin to count non-Intel chips. However, changing it to "i386" consistently would still work with existing software. Using "x86" or "ia32" or "ix86pc" (what Solaris calls it) would break stuff. -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/