Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762121AbZD1RRs (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:17:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762046AbZD1RR0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:17:26 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:38965 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762256AbZD1RRY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:17:24 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,261,1239001200"; d="scan'208";a="685698579" From: "Styner, Douglas W" To: James Bottomley , Chuck Ebbert CC: Andi Kleen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-driver@qlogic.com" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "Ma, Chinang" Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:17:23 -0700 Subject: RE: Mainline kernel OLTP performance update Thread-Topic: Mainline kernel OLTP performance update Thread-Index: AcnIJQfBL3dau9MUSeWPYiajdPM5iwAABy8w Message-ID: References: <87ljpmk29b.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20090428125705.48ef09e1@dhcp-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com> <1240938947.3380.50.camel@mulgrave.int.hansenpartnership.com> In-Reply-To: <1240938947.3380.50.camel@mulgrave.int.hansenpartnership.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1873 Lines: 53 Working on it as we speak... >-----Original Message----- >From: James Bottomley [mailto:James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com] >Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 10:16 AM >To: Chuck Ebbert >Cc: Andi Kleen; Styner, Douglas W; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux- >driver@qlogic.com; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: Mainline kernel OLTP performance update > >On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 12:57 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: >> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:02:40 +0200 >> Andi Kleen wrote: >> >> > "Styner, Douglas W" writes: >> > >> > > >> > > ======oprofile 0.9.3 CPU_CLK_UNHALTED for top 30 functions >> > > Cycles% 2.6.24.2 Cycles% 2.6.30-rc2 >> > > 74.8578 67.6966 >> > >> > The dip in database cycles is indeed worrying. >> > >> > > 1.0500 qla24xx_start_scsi 1.1724 qla24xx_start_scsi >> > > 0.8089 schedule 1.0578 qla24xx_intr_handler >> > > 0.5864 kmem_cache_alloc 0.8259 __schedule >> > > 0.4989 __blockdev_direct_IO 0.7451 kmem_cache_alloc >> > > 0.4357 __sigsetjmp 0.4872 __blockdev_direct_IO >> > > 0.4152 copy_user_generic_string 0.4390 task_rq_lock >> > > 0.3953 qla24xx_intr_handler 0.4338 __sigsetjmp >> > >> > And also why the qla24xx_intr_handler became ~2.5x as expensive. >> > Cc linux-scsi and qla24xx maintainers. >> > >> >> They are getting 31000 interrupts/sec vs. 22000/sec on older kernels. > >Should be fixed by: > >http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=124093712114937 > >If someone could verify, I'd be grateful. > >Thanks, > >James > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/