Subject: Re: Please revert edada399 and 9203fc9c
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Tim Abbott <tabbott@MIT.EDU>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
In-Reply-To: <20090428083528.GA17622@uranus.ravnborg.org>
References: <18934.35969.872225.70725@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
	 <20090428083528.GA17622@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:52:27 +1000
Message-Id: <1240951947.15263.5.camel@pasglop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 764
Lines: 22

On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 10:35 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> This is partly my fault :-(
> I acked them as I did not see the issue with conditional branches.
> Could I ask you to add a comment to the lds file about this.

I'm back :-)

Not a huge deal per-se, it's just that the patches were merged in Linus
tree only a few hours after being initially submitted it seems, which
doesn't leave much chance for anybody to test, to hit -next, or anything
like that... that was a little bit too trigger happy .

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/