Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755189AbZD2Dvz (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:51:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752492AbZD2Dvq (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:51:46 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:59908 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752455AbZD2Dvp (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:51:45 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18smgcqOmQsanTAQxPMODDrQi7vTe+9C7Cb06WR+F pMaCZ1iKkY2/p3 Subject: Re: Analyzed/Solved: Booting 2.6.30-rc2-git7 very slow From: Mike Galbraith To: Andrew Morton Cc: Martin Knoblauch , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tigran aivazian In-Reply-To: <20090428182837.62c51f26.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <409142.83316.qm@web32605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20090428182837.62c51f26.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:51:36 +0200 Message-Id: <1240977096.5478.3.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.58 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1561 Lines: 37 On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 18:28 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:45:19 -0700 (PDT) Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > > > > > > OK, I just found the reason for both intel-ucode and tg3 failures. Apparently between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29 the mount of sysfs has subtely changed from: > > > > /sys /sys sysfs rw 0 0 > > > > to: > > > > none /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0 > > I assume that you're referring to the contents of /proc/mounts? > > > The "none" breaks the RHEL-4 provided hotplug script "firmware.agent" when it tries to parse the mount point for "/sys". As a result, the firmware loading is never properly finished and the driver(s) just timeout on the value in /sys/class/firmware/timeout. Bingo. Simple fix in user-pace possible - cool down Martin :-) > > > > Questions remains: was this intentional? It breaks existing userspace and should therefore be considered a regression - right? On the other hand, it will never be a problem for RHEL-4/5 kernels, unless the change in 2.6.29 gets backported. Any ideas? > > afaik that was unintentional and was probably a mistake. > > I wonder how we did that. > [hotplug]# grep sysfs /proc/mounts > none /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0 > /sys /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0 (I wonder how the heck that is accomplished) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/