Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 13:19:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 13:19:13 -0500 Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com ([62.253.162.42]:12009 "EHLO mta02-svc.ntlworld.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 13:18:57 -0500 From: Chris Rankin Message-Id: <200203021818.g22IIo27021932@twopit.underworld> Subject: NOW have 'D-state' processes in 2.4.17 !!! To: andrea@suse.de, rgooch@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 18:18:50 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, [Linux 2.4.17, SMP, devfs, 1.2 GB memory, compiled with gcc-2.95.3, root partition using EXT3] I upgraded to 2.4.18 a few days ago, but immediately downgraded because I suddenly had lots of 'D-state' processes. Well I have now produced a suspiciously-similar-looking D-state process using 2.4.17, and I strongly suspect that either EXT3 or ALSA is somehow involved because mounting my root partition as EXT3 and adding the latest CVS ALSA modules are the only changes that I have made from my previous reliable 2.4.17 setup. The trace of the misbehaving process looks almost exactly like the last trace from 2.4.18, except this time I have run it through ksymoops: Proc; wine >>EIP; f6b2c780 <_end+36829cb4/38556534> <===== Trace; c0105af4 <__down+6c/c8> Trace; c0105c90 <__down_failed+8/c> Trace; fb3297c6 <[snd-pcm].text.end+238/612> Trace; fb323c0c <[snd-pcm]snd_pcm_playback_ioctl1+6c/340> Trace; c0143474 Trace; c015a710 Trace; c015a710 Trace; c012eeae <__alloc_pages+32/164> Trace; fb326214 <[snd-pcm]snd_pcm_hw_constraint_minmax+34/40> Trace; fb3230d8 <[snd-pcm]snd_pcm_hw_constraints_complete+138/160> Trace; fb3e72a0 <[snd-pcm-oss]snd_pcm_oss_open_file+100/220> Trace; fb3e751e <[snd-pcm-oss]snd_pcm_oss_open+15e/270> Trace; fb3e7540 <[snd-pcm-oss]snd_pcm_oss_open+180/270> Trace; c013f600 Trace; c013ead0 Trace; c0170b08 Trace; fb324284 <[snd-pcm]snd_pcm_kernel_playback_ioctl+34/40> Trace; fb3e6388 <[snd-pcm-oss]snd_pcm_oss_reset+18/50> Trace; c01437a6 Trace; c0106dba Even more interestingly, this process was freed when I killed the second wine process. This second process's trace looks like this: Proc; wine >>EIP; e0ce3c58 <_end+209e118c/38556534> <===== Trace; c011388a Trace; c01137b0 Trace; fb3222b2 <[snd-pcm]snd_pcm_playback_drain+162/280> Trace; fb323c5c <[snd-pcm]snd_pcm_playback_ioctl1+bc/340> Trace; fb3304f2 <[snd-emu10k1]snd_emu10k1_capture_prepare+52/130> Trace; fb330590 <[snd-emu10k1]snd_emu10k1_capture_prepare+f0/130> Trace; fb322010 <[snd-pcm]snd_pcm_prepare+e0/1b0> Trace; c01ffdd6 <__delay+12/28> Trace; c01ffe44 <__const_udelay+28/34> Trace; f88da65a <[eepro100]speedo_start_xmit+162/1f0> Trace; c0162a5e Trace; c0163d64 <__journal_file_buffer+e4/21c> Trace; c016312c Trace; c015cb9e Trace; c015cc06 Trace; c015d00e Trace; c015d01e Trace; c015d108 Trace; c015d1c2 Trace; c0148c12 <__mark_inode_dirty+2e/98> Trace; c01577e8 Trace; c011fa74 Trace; c011fb3a Trace; c0128984 Trace; c01137a6 Trace; fb324284 <[snd-pcm]snd_pcm_kernel_playback_ioctl+34/40> Trace; c01c53ae Trace; fb3e64a6 <[snd-pcm-oss]snd_pcm_oss_sync+e6/180> Trace; fb3e7648 <[snd-pcm-oss]snd_pcm_oss_release+18/80> Trace; c01362b4 Trace; c013514a Trace; c01191f8 Trace; c01199ce Trace; c0119b42 Trace; c0106dba Is any of this useful to anybody? Cheers, Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/