Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757606AbZD2JLh (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:11:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758926AbZD2JKQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:10:16 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f163.google.com ([209.85.218.163]:50851 "EHLO mail-bw0-f163.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759166AbZD2JKN (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:10:13 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-mutt-references :x-mutt-fcc:user-agent; b=MOE8i4C8vAcAbDm6+lwrpjFFailvh9FePsPhWwiqy5AOHRFEoIqf8O7hxygTU8nZeK oCrvHxaOgHW4V4SoqytD3OoIwDCX2Oa4xmPioe2qs1BuxZ2CPv+FQXWYjzIQyLteYthV 8Weitw4vap9gjDi8tqqMKdNpJFPBWmySOxRqU= Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:08:09 +0200 From: Jarek Poplawski To: "Alexander V. Lukyanov" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.29.1: unregister_netdevice problem Message-ID: <20090429090809.GA2995@ami.dom.local> References: <20090422055735.GA4334@night.netis.ru> <20090427054103.GA27529@night.netis.ru> <20090428125755.GA5242@night.netis.ru> <49F76BF6.4040709@gmail.com> <20090429054510.GA8267@night.netis.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090429054510.GA8267@night.netis.ru> X-Mutt-References: <20090429054510.GA8267@night.netis.ru> X-Mutt-Fcc: =outbox User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1630 Lines: 35 On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:45:10AM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:49:58PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > Do you mean if you wait a bit longer (until the first one is really removed) > > The problem is that it is never removed. I waited for at least 30 minutes. > > > before running another one, it doesn't s(t)uck? Is there a change e.g. wrt. > > 2.6.28? > > I mean, 'vconfig rem' on another interface stucks if the previous vconfig > has not finished, and it never finishes. So I cannot check if other vlan > interfaces have the same 'refcnt' problem. So far I tried 'vconfig rem' on > two vlan interfaces and I have a dozen. > > Again, the problem only happens after I notice surprisingly high LA (30 > instead of 2-6) and interactive slowness. When it happens, I check network > usage, disk usage, cpu usage, mem usage - they are normal or even lower than > usual. > > The server is running transparent squid and named. The last kernel version > was 2.6.27.21 and it did not have this problem. So looks like a regression. Alas this thing could be hard to debug and still more data is needed. For the beginning maybe: .config, dmesg, and a few SysRq logs while this happens e.g. Alt-PrtScr with t, d, w, q (gzipped or as attachments to a bugzilla report). (If it's not a big problem trying 2.6.28.9 could be helpful too.) Thanks, Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/