From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: monstr@monstr.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/30] microblaze_mmu_v1: Update linker script for MMU
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:27:49 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john.williams@petalogix.com
References: <1240821139-7247-1-git-send-email-monstr@monstr.eu> <1240821139-7247-22-git-send-email-monstr@monstr.eu> <1240821139-7247-23-git-send-email-monstr@monstr.eu>
In-Reply-To: <1240821139-7247-23-git-send-email-monstr@monstr.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200904291327.50092.arnd@arndb.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 833
Lines: 27

On Monday 27 April 2009, monstr@monstr.eu wrote:
> --- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> @@ -17,8 +17,11 @@ ENTRY(_start)
> ?jiffies = jiffies_64 + 4;
> ?
> ?SECTIONS {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> +???????. = CONFIG_KERNEL_START;
> +#else
> ????????. = CONFIG_KERNEL_BASE_ADDR;
> -
> +#endif
> ????????.text : {
> ????????????????_text = . ;
> ????????????????_stext = . ;

This change looks a bit bogus, can't you use the same symbol for
both? I guess either one would be fine, but I don't see a reason
for them to be different.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/