Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758470AbZD2Pta (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:49:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753770AbZD2PtU (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:49:20 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f176.google.com ([209.85.219.176]:56564 "EHLO mail-ew0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752523AbZD2PtT (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:49:19 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=H2Xag6g7RK1/UYzmU/WOKHjrkHoGLo+mfWSs8L2KO6+LdHcM/KeKHtQ2fC58PIG9bn U0jCBh/dWQoPEzPMKRQasyTPgV9m57vMQ2kNMNxPnXUyO2dcBtdMPu1E1+i80EIm+nxt luOeX4/nQ+97Ds2eTujonU02Yv4Wkshxm5TAQ= Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:49:14 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Andrew Morton Cc: Steven Rostedt , Zhaolei , Ingo Molnar , Tom Zanussi , KOSAKI Motohiro , Oleg Nesterov , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] workqueue_trace: Add max execution time mesurement for per worklet Message-ID: <20090429154913.GA6406@nowhere> References: <49F6DFB5.2040901@cn.fujitsu.com> <20090429000616.f7e72b73.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090429133342.GA5987@nowhere> <20090429083654.7ecf0100.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090429083654.7ecf0100.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1124 Lines: 40 On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 08:36:54AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:45:28 -0400 (EDT) Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > * pointer to the real address. > > > > > > But the output formatting is the same: address, offset, size, modname. > > > > > > I found it a bit annoying, so I proposed the following patch recently: > > > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/15/310 > > This looks OK. I'd assumed it was merged. Was there a problem with it? No, I tested it without problem. > > > And someone came with a better idea, IMO: > > > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/17/105 > > > > Note, > > > > If these ever do get merged, I would be happy to convert ftrace to use > > them to replace my version. > > I spose I could use magic powers to sneak it into .30? Thanks :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/