Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759196AbZD2QAm (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:00:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753200AbZD2QAd (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:00:33 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:6517 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752055AbZD2QAc convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:00:32 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,266,1239001200"; d="scan'208";a="137317937" From: "Styner, Douglas W" To: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Tripathi, Sharad C" , "arjan@linux.intel.com" , "Wilcox, Matthew R" , "Kleen, Andi" , "Siddha, Suresh B" , "Ma, Chinang" , "Wang, Peter Xihong" , "Nueckel, Hubert" , "Recalde, Luis F" , "Nelson, Doug" , "Cheng, Wu-sun" , "Prickett, Terry O" , "Shunmuganathan, Rajalakshmi" , "Garg, Anil K" , "Chilukuri, Harita" , "chris.mason@oracle.com" Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:00:29 -0700 Subject: RE: Mainline kernel OLTP performance update Thread-Topic: Mainline kernel OLTP performance update Thread-Index: AcnIpH2wYNuL0nVjSjitaku5DQLCvgAPXCLw Message-ID: References: <20090429002930.b786348b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <871vrbrhhy.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> In-Reply-To: <871vrbrhhy.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1755 Lines: 39 What we showed was that vmstat and vtune agreed wrt system/user time. Oprofile is off by ~4% (4% too low for user. 4% too high for system) >-----Original Message----- >From: Andi Kleen [mailto:andi@firstfloor.org] >Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 1:28 AM >To: Andrew Morton >Cc: Styner, Douglas W; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Tripathi, Sharad C; >arjan@linux.intel.com; Wilcox, Matthew R; Kleen, Andi; Siddha, Suresh B; >Ma, Chinang; Wang, Peter Xihong; Nueckel, Hubert; Recalde, Luis F; Nelson, >Doug; Cheng, Wu-sun; Prickett, Terry O; Shunmuganathan, Rajalakshmi; Garg, >Anil K; Chilukuri, Harita; chris.mason@oracle.com >Subject: Re: Mainline kernel OLTP performance update > >Andrew Morton writes: > >>> ======oprofile CPU_CLK_UNHALTED for top 30 functions >>> Cycles% 2.6.24.2 Cycles% 2.6.30-rc3 >>> 74.8578 69.1925 >> >> ouch, that's a large drop in userspace CPU occupancy. It seems >> inconsistent with the 1.91% above. > >That was determined to be an oprofile artifact/regression (see Doug's >other email+thread) The 2.6.30 oprofile seems to be less accurate than >the one in 2.6.24. Of course the question is if it can't get >the user space right, is the kernel data accurate. But I believe >Doug verified with vtune that the kernel data is roughly correct, >just user space profiling was slightly bogus (right, Doug, or >do I misrepresent that?) > >-Andi > >-- >ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/