Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761477AbZD2UIU (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:08:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753153AbZD2UIH (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:08:07 -0400 Received: from smtp.outflux.net ([198.145.64.163]:37888 "EHLO smtp.outflux.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751083AbZD2UIH (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:08:07 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 771 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:08:06 EDT Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:54:53 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: CC_STACKPROTECTOR vs CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL Message-ID: <20090429195453.GE8586@outflux.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: Ubuntu X-HELO: www.outflux.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 560 Lines: 19 Hi, What is the rationale for why CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL is forced when using CC_STACKPROTECTOR? I would have expected _ALL to be a separate option (as it was in earlier versions), but it seems it is forced on by commit 113c5413cf9051cc50b88befdc42e3402bb92115. Thanks, -Kees -- Kees Cook Ubuntu Security Team -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/