Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 19:56:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 19:55:54 -0500 Received: from dsl092-237-176.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.237.176]:41733 "EHLO whisper.qrpff.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 19:55:41 -0500 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020302195020.01d0c948@whisper.qrpff.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 19:50:45 -0500 To: erich@uruk.org, Alan Cox From: Stevie O Subject: Re: Network Security hole (was -> Re: arp bug ) Cc: ja@ssi.bg (Julian Anastasov), szekeres@lhsystems.hu (Szekeres Bela), dang@fprintf.net (Daniel Gryniewicz), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (linux-kernel) In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 11:58 AM 3/2/2002 -0800, erich@uruk.org wrote: >I would think that making the IP stack, for each MAC/interface path >on reception, just check against the exact expected input address, >would actually be a performance improvement on machines with multiple >NICs. Two words: Broadcast addresses. -- Stevie-O Real programmers use COPY CON PROGRAM.EXE - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/