Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763325AbZD2Wo7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:44:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762323AbZD2WbA (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:31:00 -0400 Received: from ausxipps301.us.dell.com ([143.166.148.223]:41507 "EHLO ausxipps301.us.dell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762300AbZD2Wa6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:30:58 -0400 Message-ID: <49F8D52C.6000200@dell.com> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:31:08 -0500 From: Mario Limonciello User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Garrett CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add support for more dell-wmi hotkeys References: <49ECBAE2.2080308@dell.com> <49EE09D9.2060209@dell.com> <20090429165729.GB32619@srcf.ucam.org> <49F89981.10806@dell.com> <20090429183154.GC2325@srcf.ucam.org> <49F8C59F.2010603@dell.com> <20090429212924.GA7900@srcf.ucam.org> In-Reply-To: <20090429212924.GA7900@srcf.ucam.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2696E8A015B9414078ACA2D2" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1771 Lines: 46 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2696E8A015B9414078ACA2D2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Matthew: Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 04:24:47PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: > > Ok. Is there any programmatic way to determine whether a given Dell=20 > complies with your WMI spec or not? I'd prefer not to use DMI tables=20 > unless it's the only way to identify the machines - the risk is that=20 > there'll be something else that also uses its own codes and will just=20 > behave oddly until someone figures out why it's broken. > =20 Not that I can easily discern. The only relevant bit that i'm finding is whether a key is reported as "programmable", which might be the case for the M6300. I'll try to look further into it to see if that's the case here, and if that information can be flagged upon. --=20 Mario Limonciello *Dell | Linux Engineering* mario_limonciello@dell.com --------------enig2696E8A015B9414078ACA2D2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkn41SwACgkQ2CrZjkA73Yv7NQCfZbCoWoRTf/9xBZ2sG16yAM5+ RH8An2TPA8YAeYEh8oLRGlO8SM0bHonb =BNj2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2696E8A015B9414078ACA2D2-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/