Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763921AbZD3Ny6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:54:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762501AbZD3Nyp (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:54:45 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.188]:51894 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758195AbZD3Nyn (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:54:43 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: monstr@monstr.eu Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/30] microblaze_mmu_v1: stat.h MMU update Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:53:46 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john.williams@petalogix.com References: <1240821139-7247-23-git-send-email-monstr@monstr.eu> <200904271447.40984.arnd@arndb.de> <49F5A9A8.8010306@monstr.eu> In-Reply-To: <49F5A9A8.8010306@monstr.eu> X-Face: I@=L^?./?$U,EK.)V[4*>`zSqm0>65YtkOe>TFD'!aw?7OVv#~5xd\s,[~w]-J!)|%=]>=?utf-8?q?+=0A=09=7EohchhkRGW=3F=7C6=5FqTmkd=5Ft=3FLZC=23Q-=60=2E=60Y=2Ea=5E?= =?utf-8?q?3zb?=) =?utf-8?q?+U-JVN=5DWT=25cw=23=5BYo0=267C=26bL12wWGlZi=0A=09=7EJ=3B=5Cwg?= =?utf-8?q?=3B3zRnz?=,J"CT_)=\H'1/{?SR7GDu?WIopm.HaBG=QYj"NZD_[zrM\Gip^U MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904301553.47556.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19ldyE4CZYnYWOYpvLcVxJSdqDusEKDmmAYWmU UutlCrxl2fxqx0GKVyV02ULF7f1VU11Ct8wIm9K3wDGvO4rRtw NZnWWLfNK1cqXDB+Yr4cQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1225 Lines: 29 On Monday 27 April 2009, Michal Simek wrote: > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 27 April 2009, Michal Simek wrote: > >>> st_size represents an off_t in user space, which is signed. > >>> Just over half the existing architectures use signed types > >>> for st_size, but for this (like Sam's suggestion for __u64), > >>> I don't think it matters either way. > >> OK. Is it mean that your structure is perfect? If yes, > >> I'll recompile toolchain and do some more tests. > > > > Please wait for my full patches, which I am about to > > post. I hope to get to the stage where literally none > > of the ABI is defined in your own header files but > > it all gets into the generic parts. I hope to get this > > out within a few hours. > > OK. Any success so far with the patches I posted? I guess you need to apply just the first of the three microblaze patches in the series first to see if that works, before changing the signal handling and syscall table as well. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/