Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 08:35:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 08:35:02 -0500 Received: from white-ippp0.koehntopp.de ([195.244.233.49]:30469 "EHLO white.koehntopp.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 08:34:51 -0500 Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 14:34:56 +0100 From: Kristian Koehntopp To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: DRL for RAID 1? Message-ID: <20020303143456.A8587@white.koehntopp.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Has anybody implemented DRL for RAID 1? After a crash, my RAID 1 tries to resync the entire mirror: kris@valiant:~> cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] read_ahead 1024 sectors md0 : active raid1 sdc8[1] sda8[0] 12241408 blocks [2/2] [UU] [==>..................] resync = 11.0% (1358400/12241408) finish=124.3min speed=1457K/sec unused devices: With a region bitmap and dirty region logging, the recovery time would be much lower, since the RAID subsystem does not have to resync all of the disk, but only those regions marked as dirty during a crash. Kristian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/