Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 08:50:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 08:50:06 -0500 Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de ([195.20.224.200]:12071 "EHLO moutvdom01.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 08:49:52 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Hans-Peter Jansen Organization: LISA GmbH To: Andre Hedrick , john slee Subject: Re: Please Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 14:49:07 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Hans-Peter Jansen , Henrik Lassen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , ataraid-list@redhat.com In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20020303134908.0D3F71546@shrek.lisa.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday, 3. March 2002 01:25, Andre Hedrick wrote: > On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, john slee wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 04:43:58PM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: > > > The problem is called Andre Hedrick, a guy who is talking in miracles, > > > but seems to be unable to fix either the issues with: > > > - the single TX4 with multiple PDC20270 > > > nor: > > > - multiple TX2 with PDC20268 > > > > > > or at least ignores further communication on that problems, if you > > > don't use some magic storage peoples language.(*) TM in a parallel > > > universe, not too far from here... > > > > so you're going to fix the problems yourself then? > > > > j. > > You mean this does not work for you? Serious question, not being flip. > > Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31 > ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx > AMD7441: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39 > AMD7441: chipset revision 3 > AMD7441: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later > AMD7441: disabling single-word DMA support (revision < C4) > ide0: BM-DMA at 0xd000-0xd007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio > ide1: BM-DMA at 0xd008-0xd00f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio > PDC20270: IDE controller on PCI bus 03 dev 08 > PDC20270: chipset revision 2 > PDC20270: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later > ide2: BM-DMA at 0x9000-0x9007, BIOS settings: hde:pio, hdf:pio > ide3: BM-DMA at 0x9008-0x900f, BIOS settings: hdg:pio, hdh:pio > PDC20270: IDE controller on PCI bus 03 dev 10 > PDC20270: chipset revision 2 > PDC20270: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later > PDC20270: ROM enabled at 0x000dc000 > ide4: BM-DMA at 0xa400-0xa407, BIOS settings: hdi:pio, hdj:pio > ide5: BM-DMA at 0xa408-0xa40f, BIOS settings: hdk:pio, hdl:pio > hda: IBM-DTLA-307075, ATA DISK drive > hdc: LTN242, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive > hde: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive > hdg: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive > hdi: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive > hdk: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive > ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 > ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 > ide2 at 0x8000-0x8007,0x8402 on irq 11 > ide3 at 0x8800-0x8807,0x8c02 on irq 11 > ide4 at 0x9400-0x9407,0x9802 on irq 11 > ide5 at 0x9c00-0x9c07,0xa002 on irq 11 > hda: 150136560 sectors (76870 MB) w/1916KiB Cache, CHS=9345/255/63, > UDMA(100) hde: 320173056 sectors (163929 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, > CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(100) hdg: 320173056 sectors (163929 MB) w/2048KiB > Cache, CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(100) hdi: 320173056 sectors (163929 MB) > w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(100) hdk: 320173056 sectors (163929 > MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(100) Partition check: > /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 p2 p3 < p5 p6 p7 p8 p9 p10 > > /dev/ide/host2/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 > /dev/ide/host2/bus1/target0/lun0: p1 > /dev/ide/host4/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 > /dev/ide/host4/bus1/target0/lun0: p1 > Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M > FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077 > > > > Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31 > ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx > AMD7441: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39 > AMD7441: chipset revision 3 > AMD7441: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later > AMD7441: disabling single-word DMA support (revision < C4) > ide0: BM-DMA at 0xb000-0xb007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio > ide1: BM-DMA at 0xb008-0xb00f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio > PDC20269: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 40 > PDC20269: chipset revision 2 > PDC20269: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later > ide2: BM-DMA at 0xd400-0xd407, BIOS settings: hde:pio, hdf:pio > ide3: BM-DMA at 0xd408-0xd40f, BIOS settings: hdg:pio, hdh:pio > PDC20269: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 48 > PDC20269: chipset revision 2 > PDC20269: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later > ide4: BM-DMA at 0xe800-0xe807, BIOS settings: hdi:pio, hdj:pio > ide5: BM-DMA at 0xe808-0xe80f, BIOS settings: hdk:pio, hdl:pio > hda: IBM-DTLA-307075, ATA DISK drive > hdc: LTN242, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive > hde: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive > hdg: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive > hdi: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive > hdk: Maxtor 4G160J8, ATA DISK drive > ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 > ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 > ide2 at 0xc400-0xc407,0xc802 on irq 10 > ide3 at 0xcc00-0xcc07,0xd002 on irq 10 > ide4 at 0xd800-0xd807,0xdc02 on irq 11 > ide5 at 0xe000-0xe007,0xe402 on irq 11 > hda: 150136560 sectors (76870 MB) w/1916KiB Cache, CHS=9345/255/63, > UDMA(100) hde: 320173056 sectors (163929 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, > CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(133) hdg: 320173056 sectors (163929 MB) w/2048KiB > Cache, CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(133) hdi: 320173056 sectors (163929 MB) > w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(133) hdk: 320173056 sectors (163929 > MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=19929/255/63, UDMA(133) Partition check: > /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 p2 p3 < p5 p6 p7 p8 p9 p10 > > /dev/ide/host2/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 > /dev/ide/host2/bus1/target0/lun0: p1 > /dev/ide/host4/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 > /dev/ide/host4/bus1/target0/lun0: p1 > Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M > FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077 > Looks promising, indeed. Will try it again, soon... In general, I fear, that the whole ATA technology commits suiside because of it's own inherent complexity and historical development. > Clearly they work, the obvious point that is missed is the work is not > being accepted. Oh and I am human, too, regardless what most think or > hate about me. And I understand your point. But light appears on the horizon. Your work is being accepted for 2.5 and 2.4-ac now, and there is hope, that sometimes in the near future a generally accepted, and (nearly) flawless version of 2.4 will be released. For now, diff/patch seems to remain everyone's favorite tools ;) > Regards, > > Andre Hedrick > Linux Disk Certification Project Linux ATA Development Cheers, Hans-Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/