Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 19:19:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 19:19:11 -0500 Received: from ip68-4-123-226.oc.oc.cox.net ([68.4.123.226]:29169 "HELO cx518206-b.irvn1.occa.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 19:18:59 -0500 Subject: Re: Invalid @home email addresses To: tmolina@cox.net (Thomas Molina) Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 16:20:30 -0800 (PST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Thomas Molina" at Mar 02, 2002 11:18:21 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20020304002030.7348089C87@cx518206-b.irvn1.occa.home.com> From: barryn@pobox.com (Barry K. Nathan) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thomas Molina wrote: > Most addresses for home.com users simply switched to cox.net addresses. Uh, no. I think (but am not sure) that more @home.com addresses became @attbi.com than @cox.net. Even if I'm wrong about that, I'm almost certain that more became @attbi.com + @rogers.ca + @shaw.ca + @charterpipeline.com + @comcast.net + ... than @cox.net. (It's possible that I made errors in the past sentence, perhaps confusing .com and .net stuff or the like, but even in the face of such errors I think my point still stands.) > However, email to the above users at cox.net bounced in four out of five > cases. I wouldn't be surprised if four out of five weren't with Cox in the first place. -Barry K. Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/