Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 22:06:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 22:06:08 -0500 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.201.151.6]:20233 "EHLO osdlab.pdx.osdl.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 22:05:59 -0500 Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 19:05:51 -0800 (PST) From: X-X-Sender: To: Hans-Christian Armingeon cc: Subject: Re: Recommendations about a 100/10 NIC In-Reply-To: <16hcB4-12EIHAC@fmrl03.sul.t-online.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, Hans-Christian Armingeon wrote: | Am Sonntag, 3. M?rz 2002 15:22 schrieb Justin Piszcz: | > I'd reccomend a 3COM, as they come with a lifetime warranty and have always | > been good for me. | > Not sure about Intels. | > I have a 3com 905b, the current model is a 3com 905C-TX like you mentioned. | Which of those cards supports calculating ethernet checksums in hardware? All of them do ethernet checksums^W CRCs in hardware. Did you mean something like, "which ones do IP and/or TCP checksums (offloads) in hardware?" -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/