Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 00:41:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 00:41:06 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:28167 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 00:40:59 -0500 Message-ID: <3C8308FE.FC4FA42@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 00:41:18 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Dilger CC: Daniel Phillips , Andrew Morton , lkml Subject: Re: [patch] delayed disk block allocation In-Reply-To: <3C7F3B4A.41DB7754@zip.com.au> <20020304050450.GF353@matchmail.com> <20020303223103.J4188@lynx.adilger.int> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andreas Dilger wrote: > Actually, there are a whole bunch of performance issues with 1kB block > ext2 filesystems. For very small files, you are probably better off > to have tails in EAs stored with the inode, or with other tails/EAs in > a shared block. We discussed this on ext2-devel a few months ago, and > while the current ext2 EA design is totally unsuitable for that, it > isn't impossible to fix. IMO the ext2 filesystem design is on it's last legs ;-) I tend to think that a new filesystem efficiently handling these features is far better than dragging ext2 kicking and screaming into the 2002's :) -- Jeff Garzik | Building 1024 | MandrakeSoft | Choose life. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/