Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757548AbZFBQvU (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:51:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753880AbZFBQvK (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:51:10 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f216.google.com ([209.85.220.216]:63432 "EHLO mail-fx0-f216.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753933AbZFBQvJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:51:09 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=UgAnJTUOaIti35kR3FzEM47NSNSI4v6CTaI/sq7pAr5ckEJAH5qyyZwEfZTm5T9h9A CPJUJNLKZCfT8gjhA7qSXh4KlKDb3rqBgRlue+mKdLI5wX0RYcew+9QGcybfzkJO2N+D 0NshO5mEp5fLfyYeQtSznRykA9ARSsXc7hRaM= Subject: Re: [2.6.27-rc7 vs 2.6.29 Regresion] Wifi Network Slownes rt2500pci From: Alejandro Riveira =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez?= Reply-To: alejandro.riveira@gmail.com To: Ivo van Doorn Cc: linux-wireless , linux-kernel , linville@tuxdriver.com, Greg KH , "Rafael J. Wysocki" In-Reply-To: <200906021834.40009.IvDoorn@gmail.com> References: <1243247687.5322.8.camel@varda> <1243351397.4888.2.camel@varda> <1243951292.22942.1.camel@varda> <200906021834.40009.IvDoorn@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xqSLr7diPuRo3bwbiEDD" Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:51:05 +0200 Message-Id: <1243961465.9894.3.camel@varda> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2423 Lines: 69 --=-xqSLr7diPuRo3bwbiEDD Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El mar, 02-06-2009 a las 18:34 +0200, Ivo van Doorn escribi=C3=B3: > On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fern=C3=A1ndez wrote: [...] > > ICMP ECHO REQUEST > >=20 > > Any advance? >=20 > Well I checked the dumps from the bugreport, but like I expected > the only difference is that with the slow speed the correct value > is written, and the fast speed the wrong value is written. So my chip works better with incorrect values written in its registers? /me confused What about other chips out there do they prefer wrong values too ;) Maybe what we thought wrong values are not that wrong ? /me stops rambling > I couldn't find anything else interesting in it... :( Thanks anyway. >=20 > Ivo --=20 OOP to me means only messaging, local retention and protection and hiding of state-process, and extreme late-binding of all things. It can be done in Smalltalk and in LISP. There are possibly other systems in which this is possible, but I'm not aware of them. -- Alan Kay -- --=-xqSLr7diPuRo3bwbiEDD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Esto es una parte de mensaje firmado digitalmente -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJKJVhzAAoJEDO4iEReSTB2fg0QAML3N8nusJHAQ2+8+MGmspnA D5Zzmq5Wy03DSY4QP2yqXOE4B/nS9iEtBEtWXYt5t0NjuKySKykgNj9ZTQB87AoP uX1Ezuw1JW3yQ3nBpdKqNivPbXX9+hRvsvi7fVy5tt3CR1aD70tv09C5gsi7qKYY OhZaR72X5IArPkdyv+lGx1PrHWF+KB255L3iJ3rE+nBSWCHMS0n+EOUzGTlAuCpI mmN2wAJt32mpsuvLgTsFWu1r98yyQR8f5c9GzFvg+YpLkQWVz4nnNfpT/5g2ii3P AVJsFLMlGfr0luHYTf0M5c55J5A4nxZq0C4zXtb3yRmrXW2jCfp5w9UEq2lsYR/I 23wW5RBJDSvb+VIS3hsvBv+awA5X17F0aClTdfXNw02p1cZ7P516+S1M6q6w7Qq1 o5s5OskEL8aLbKQ7Ex2Dw1oxjQmUtNAiigo0z5NALNUSAG//RAYEA2GMuPwReuAC Ov+f624eYU5bbDk99poYyLT/omPRG67MsknjEq5Zm6JCWvHdJQSS2VjFHJm3QXT5 OFcvoS7bwdL5iBVNh4vrWvAeZSoeDJXv/j+T0ArXLkRAo8WBw36AB0XBz2Lcv426 9khuD+IsLfxtvMbExeGkDicBESzFWXXJg02t+I0o9HyzSSxpOsm9rvuHwPr1g3n0 UJhEzNS4xOXWTQKnDfpi =tvS2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xqSLr7diPuRo3bwbiEDD-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/