Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754440AbZFBVxy (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:53:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751981AbZFBVxs (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:53:48 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.156]:13558 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750994AbZFBVxr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:53:47 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=qQJrOW/H5AfN/JBUByOR95fch7GT7JCR+768qppaHFtMUyuzfg0DbbdfdYgD9Hx1vQ 1aDiLcDiLLLv26UFqVrn26g/cERCVSgJarpaOv+L0ajPCJyQI5HcHb3hHi2wUVCa1X3W Gec5AU+lOzWKWAl+gRxjARPPbnYQx2mc/J38s= From: Ivo van Doorn To: alejandro.riveira@gmail.com Subject: Re: [2.6.27-rc7 vs 2.6.29 Regresion] Wifi Network Slownes rt2500pci Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:53:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linux-wireless , linux-kernel , linville@tuxdriver.com, Greg KH , "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <1243247687.5322.8.camel@varda> <200906021834.40009.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <1243961465.9894.3.camel@varda> In-Reply-To: <1243961465.9894.3.camel@varda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906022353.44284.IvDoorn@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1173 Lines: 31 On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fern?ndez wrote: > El mar, 02-06-2009 a las 18:34 +0200, Ivo van Doorn escribi?: > > On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fern?ndez wrote: > > [...] > > > > ICMP ECHO REQUEST > > > > > > Any advance? > > > > Well I checked the dumps from the bugreport, but like I expected > > the only difference is that with the slow speed the correct value > > is written, and the fast speed the wrong value is written. > > So my chip works better with incorrect values written in its registers? Apparently, probably because some other register is set to an incorrect value, but I have no idea which one that would be. > What about other chips out there do they prefer wrong values too ;) > Maybe what we thought wrong values are not that wrong ? They are wrong. That exact register initialization is pretty straightforward in the original Ralink driver on which rt2x00 is based. Ivo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/