Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755517AbZFBXjZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:39:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751742AbZFBXjN (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:39:13 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com ([209.85.219.224]:45343 "EHLO mail-ew0-f224.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751343AbZFBXjM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:39:12 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=HbMrcc6xQ/SmH4eciigQx79bOQvjZNDqTHEJpgZQA4UP7NR2obXk5DipgUauE++K4R Rd/mXg4al4+SDkuPisEpxa/t6ksNySW6pkv3Rn9dRVdJL/Ay/6YNGkA4yjI66HeqsDK8 c0o7/uxOhR5o+T449c3pToUCC37j6R1UVWN6E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:39:12 -0400 Message-ID: <170fa0d20906021639w5daa0572p7c27e0d62cc03952@mail.gmail.com> Subject: MD and DM (was: Re: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 3.0 - A tool for managing Soft RAID under Linux) From: Mike Snitzer To: Dan Williams Cc: Jeff Garzik , Neil Brown , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-fsdevel , Arjan van de Ven , Alan Cox , Ed Ciechanowski , Jacek Danecki , device-mapper development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4867 Lines: 109 On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Neil Brown wrote: >>> >>> I am pleased to (finally) announce the availability of >>> ? mdadm version 3.0 >>> >>> It is available at the usual places: >>> ? countrycode=xx. >>> ? http://www.${countrycode}kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/raid/mdadm/ >>> and via git at >>> ? git://neil.brown.name/mdadm >>> ? http://neil.brown.name/git?p=mdadm >>> >>> >>> This is a major new version and as such should be treated with some >>> caution. ?However it has seen substantial testing and is considerred >>> to be ready for wide use. >>> >>> >>> The significant change which justifies the new major version number is >>> that mdadm can now handle metadata updates entirely in userspace. >>> This allows mdadm to support metadata formats that the kernel knows >>> nothing about. >>> >>> Currently two such metadata formats are supported: >>> ?- DDF ?- The SNIA standard format >>> ?- Intel Matrix - The metadata used by recent Intel ICH controlers. >> >> This seems pretty awful from a support standpoint: ?dmraid has been the sole >> provider of support for vendor-proprietary up until this point. > > This bares similarities with the early difficulties of selecting > between ide and libata. > >> Now Linux users -- and distro installers -- must choose between software >> RAID stack "MD" and software RAID stack "DM". ?That choice is made _not_ >> based on features, but on knowing the underlying RAID metadata format that >> is required, and what features you need out of it. >> >> dmraid already supports >> ? ? ? ?- Intel RAID format, touched by Intel as recently as 2007 >> ? ? ? ?- DDF, the SNIA standard format >> >> This obviously generates some relevant questions... >> >> 1) Why? ?This obviously duplicates existing effort and code. ?The only >> compelling reason I see is RAID5 support, which DM lacks IIRC -- but the >> huge issue of user support and duplicated code remains. > > The MD raid5 code has been upstream since forever and already has > features like online capacity expansion. ?There is also > infrastructure, upstream, for online raid level migration. > >> 2) Adding container-like handling obviously moves MD in the direction of DM. >> ?Does that imply someone will be looking at integrating the two codebases, >> or will this begin to implement features also found in DM's codebase? > > I made a proof-of-concept investigation of what it would take to > activate all dmraid arrays (any metadata format, any raid level) with > MD. ?The result, dm2md [1], did not stimulate much in the way of > conversation. > > A pluggable architecture for a write-intent log seems to be the only > piece that does not have a current equivalent in MD. ?However, the > 'bitmap' infrastructure covers most needs. ?I think unifying on a > write-intent logging infrastructure is a good place to start working > together. > >> 3) What is the status of distro integration efforts? ?I wager the distro >> installer guys will grumble at having to choose among duplicated RAID code >> and formats. > > There has been some grumbling, but the benefits of using one > linux-raid infrastructure for md-metadata and vendor metadata is > appealing. ?mdadm-3.0 also makes a serious effort to be more agreeable > with udev and incremental discovery. ?So hopefully this makes mdadm > easier to handle in the installer. > >> 4) What is the plan for handling existing Intel RAID users (e.g. dmraid + >> Intel RAID)? ?Has Intel been contacted about dmraid issues? ?What does Intel >> think about this lovely user confusion shoved into their laps? > > The confusion was the other way round. ?We were faced with how to > achieve long term feature parity of our raid solution across OS's and > the community presented us with two directions DM and MD. ?The > decision was made to support and maintain dmraid for existing > deployments while basing future development on extending the MD stack, > because it gave some feature advantages out of the gate. ?So, there is > support for both and new development will focus on MD. > >> 5) Have the dmraid maintainer and DM folks been queried, given that you are >> duplicating their functionality via Intel and DDF RAID formats? What was >> their response, what issues were raised and resolved? > > There have been interludes, but not much in the way of discussion. > Hopefully, this will be a starting point. > > Thanks, > Dan > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=123300614013042&w=2 dm-devel should be cc'd to get a dialog going with the DM team. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/