Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 10:10:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 10:10:02 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:38921 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 10:09:50 -0500 Message-ID: <3C838E52.CE3020B5@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 10:10:10 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rwhron@earthlink.net CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@zip.com.au Subject: Re: [patch] delayed disk block allocation In-Reply-To: <20020304145450.GA14256@rushmore> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org rwhron@earthlink.net wrote: > 2.5.6-pre2-akpm compiled with MPIO_DEBUG = 0 and ext2 > filesystem mounted with delalloc. > > tiobench and dbench were on ext2. > bonnie++ and most other tests were on reiserfs. > > 2.5.6-pre2-akpm throughput on ext2 is much improved. > > http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/akpm.html This page of statistics is pretty gnifty -- I wish more people posted such :) I also like your other comparisons at the top of that link... I was thinking, what would be even more neat and more useful as well would be to post comparisons -between- the various kernels you have tested, i.e. a single page that includes benchmarks for 2.4.x-official, 2.5.x-official, -aa, -rmap, etc. Regards, Jeff -- Jeff Garzik | Building 1024 | MandrakeSoft | Choose life. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/