Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757863AbZFCPXV (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:23:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754059AbZFCPXO (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:23:14 -0400 Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com ([195.212.17.161]:35031 "EHLO mtagate1.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753981AbZFCPXN (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:23:13 -0400 Message-Id: <20090603152223.083010123@de.ibm.com> User-Agent: quilt/0.46-1 Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:22:23 +0200 From: Martin Schwidefsky To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Rob van der Heij , Heiko Carstens , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , john stultz , Andi Kleen Subject: [patch 0/2] NOHZ vs. profile/oprofile v2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 659 Lines: 19 Greetings, version 2 of the profile patches. The only change is the in_interrupt() fix in tick_nohz_stop_idle(). I would like to know how to proceed with the issue. Andy, do you still prefer to handle the old style profiler analog to the oprofile patch? If yes I would drop patch #1 and extend patch #2 with another tick_nohz_disable(). -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/