Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758403AbZFCPi0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:38:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757259AbZFCPhv (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:37:51 -0400 Received: from mx-out.daemonmail.net ([216.104.160.38]:47263 "EHLO mx-out.daemonmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757052AbZFCPhu (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:37:50 -0400 From: "Michael S. Zick" Reply-To: lkml@morethan.org To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: [RFC: Style] Kernel coding style for Extended Attributes. Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:37:47 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Linus Torvalds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906031037.50803.lkml@morethan.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 597 Lines: 20 Group; I notice two different styles being used: __attribute__ (( .... __attribute__(( .... The gcc documentation does not make a comment on this, in fact, the extended attribute doc page uses both. ;) As a matter of fact, there are macros defined that have both (not at once) expansions. Is there a recommended style for the kernel source? Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/