Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756326AbZFDCD0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:03:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754219AbZFDCDS (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:03:18 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:5870 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754217AbZFDCDR (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:03:17 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,301,1241420400"; d="scan'208";a="463284126" From: "Gao, Yunpeng" To: Greg KH , Randy Dunlap CC: Stephen Rothwell , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , LKML Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:04:37 +0800 Subject: RE: linux-next: Tree for June 3 (staging) Thread-Topic: linux-next: Tree for June 3 (staging) Thread-Index: AcnkoUPMKNaTe+ayRmOjWVxSzG60nAAFoRKQ Message-ID: <38D9F46DFF92C54980D2F2C1E8EE313001A457D1D2@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20090603190952.2dd0cc70.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4A2695C1.2060104@oracle.com> <20090603152558.GA25725@suse.de> <4A269971.1050004@oracle.com> <20090603231152.GA18701@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20090603231152.GA18701@suse.de> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by alpha.home.local id n5423r54016909 Content-Length: 2211 Lines: 59 Hi Greg, Thanks for the reminder. I'll check the code in 2.6.30-rc8 and generate new patch to fix this bug as soon as. Thanks. Rgds, Yunpeng >-----Original Message----- >From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@suse.de] >Sent: 2009??6??4?? 7:12 >To: Randy Dunlap; Gao, Yunpeng >Cc: Stephen Rothwell; linux-next@vger.kernel.org; LKML >Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 3 (staging) > >On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:40:33AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Greg KH wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:24:49AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >> >>> >> >>> Looks like a real rush since -rc7 ... >> >> >> >> drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/adq12b.c:328: error: implicit declaration >of function 'udelay' >> >> >> >> >> >> drivers/staging/mrst_nand/ffsport.c:360:error: 'struct request' has no >member named 'sector' >> >> drivers/staging/mrst_nand/ffsport.c:376:error: 'struct request' has no >member named 'sector' >> >> drivers/staging/mrst_nand/ffsport.c:376:error: 'struct request' has no >member named 'current_nr_sectors' >> >> drivers/staging/mrst_nand/ffsport.c:380:error: 'struct request' has no >member named 'sector' >> >> drivers/staging/mrst_nand/ffsport.c:381:error: 'struct request' has no >member named 'current_nr_sectors' >> >> drivers/staging/mrst_nand/ffsport.c:392:error: 'struct request' has no >member named 'current_nr_sectors' >> >> drivers/staging/mrst_nand/ffsport.c:499:error: implicit declaration of >function 'elv_next_request' >> >> drivers/staging/mrst_nand/ffsport.c:517:error: implicit declaration of >function 'end_request' >> >> drivers/staging/mrst_nand/ffsport.c:738:error: implicit declaration of >function 'blk_queue_hardsect_size' >> > >> > Can I get your .config for this? It works here with a "default" one. >> >> attached (for mrst_nand/ffsport.c build errors) > >Ah, thanks, figured it out. > >Gao, this looks like a problem in your ffsport.c code. It isn't up to >date with the 2.6.30-rc8 kernel tree. Care to send me a follow-on patch >to fix this up? > >thanks, > >greg k-h ????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?