Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 12:46:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 12:46:04 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:47626 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 12:45:55 -0500 Message-ID: <3C83B2E7.B5EB0FB5@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 12:46:15 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Dillow CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] IBM Lanstreamer bugfixes (round 3) In-Reply-To: <3C83A925.F93BF448@mandrakesoft.com> <3C83AE6B.9B5DE85F@y12.doe.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Dillow wrote: > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Set cache line size just like drivers/net/acenic.c does, and enable > > memory-write-invalidate... > > Does this mean the setup pci_enable_device() does on the cache line size > is not sufficient? pci_enable_device doesn't touch the PCI_COMMAND_INVALIDATE bit at all... > I ask, because I've been relying on it for a driver I'm working on; > should I be setting this as acenic does? It would seem that this is > something many drivers would need to do... Yes, acenic is the code to copy, for setting that up. I need to create a pci_set_mwi() helper function. Jeff -- Jeff Garzik | Building 1024 | MandrakeSoft | Choose life. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/