Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758562AbZFDMum (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:50:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756511AbZFDMuf (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:50:35 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:7775 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755592AbZFDMue (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:50:34 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,305,1241420400"; d="scan'208";a="150615714" Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 20:50:26 +0800 From: Wu Fengguang To: Andi Kleen Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "npiggin@suse.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] [6/16] HWPOISON: Add various poison checks in mm/memory.c Message-ID: <20090604125026.GA29026@localhost> References: <20090603846.816684333@firstfloor.org> <20090603184639.1933B1D028F@basil.firstfloor.org> <20090604042603.GA15682@localhost> <20090604051915.GN1065@one.firstfloor.org> <20090604115533.GB22118@localhost> <20090604125228.GZ1065@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090604125228.GZ1065@one.firstfloor.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1324 Lines: 31 On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 08:52:28PM +0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 07:55:33PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 01:19:15PM +0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 12:26:03PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 02:46:38AM +0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Bail out early when hardware poisoned pages are found in page fault handling. > > > > > > > > I suspect this patch is also not absolutely necessary: the poisoned > > > > page will normally have been isolated already. > > > > > > It's needed to prevent new pages comming in when there is a parallel > > > fault while the memory failure handling is in process. > > > Otherwise the pages could get remapped in that small window. > > > > This patch makes no difference at least for file pages, including tmpfs. > > I was more thinking of anonymous pages with multiple mappers (e.g. > COW after fork) I guess they are handled by do_anonymous_page() or do_wp_page(), instead of do_linear_fault()/do_nonlinear_fault()? Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/