Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S292792AbSCDT1a>; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 14:27:30 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S292795AbSCDT1K>; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 14:27:10 -0500
Received: from tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil ([204.222.179.33]:33062 "EHLO
	tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S292792AbSCDT1G>; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 14:27:06 -0500
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 13:27:04 -0600 (CST)
From: Jesse Pollard <pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>
Message-Id: <200203041927.NAA95433@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>
To: Weimer@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SSSCA: We're in trouble now
X-Mailer: [XMailTool v3.1.2b]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Florian Weimer <Weimer@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE>:
> Thomas Hood <jdthood@mail.com> writes:
> 
> >> The solution is simple: go and create your own content, and share it
> >> with your friends. But you won't get Hollywood movies this way.
> >
> > The problem is that copy-protection will only be effective
> > if you impose Soviet style restrictions on the use of computers.
> 
> That's not necessarily true.  Most people cannot circumvent even basic
> obstacles when it comes to computers, and both industry and
> legislative might be content with that.

Not a chance. Think about it, if the legistators would be content with that
then they wouldn't need additional laws... M$ is already that way.

This is aimed at people that KNOW what they want, and know HOW to get it.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesse I Pollard, II
Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil

Any opinions expressed are solely my own.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/