Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754803AbZFEEO2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 00:14:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752349AbZFEEOV (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 00:14:21 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:56200 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752230AbZFEEOU (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 00:14:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 21:13:50 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Mike Frysinger Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, jason.wessel@windriver.com, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] kgdbts: unify/generalize gdb breakpoint adjustment Message-Id: <20090604211350.9aafa731.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0906042100j9a44f95g7d05a515725c9d5@mail.gmail.com> References: <1243927050-30685-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20090604175030.55cc4a68.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <8bd0f97a0906041755q7588ba76l1e4e1eb8bdbe336@mail.gmail.com> <20090604180420.2805fcdd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <8bd0f97a0906041850v4a41082fkf9726ae1bdd299cb@mail.gmail.com> <20090604192723.36874fcb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <8bd0f97a0906042100j9a44f95g7d05a515725c9d5@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1651 Lines: 57 On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 00:00:22 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > your version after all requires every arch to copy & paste this crap: > static inline unsigned long instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs) > { > return regs->ip; > } > static inline void instruction_pointer_set(struct pt_regs *regs, > unsigned long val) > { > regs->ip = val; > } > > and then actual usage turns into: > instruction_pointer_set(regs, instruction_pointer(regs) + foo); > > whereas mine is two lines: > #define instruction_pointer(regs) ((regs)->ip) > instruction_pointer(regs) += val; The aim isn't really to reduce the amount of typing one needs to do. Let's get things right, and if getting it right involves more typing then so be it. If it really worries you then you could do #define GET_IP(regs) ((regs)->ip) #include and static inline unsigned long instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs) { return GET_IP(regs); } static inline void instruction_pointer_set(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long val) { GET_IP(regs) = val; } Note that GET_IP() is all-caps, which says "this is a macro". But I don't think it's worth the ickyness, unless we also incorporate kernel_stack_pointer(), frame_pointer(), user_stack_pointer() and perhaps the _set() versions of those also. Do we know how to implement instruction_pointer_set() on ia64, btw? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/