Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754237AbZFEHLU (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 03:11:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750950AbZFEHLK (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 03:11:10 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:49802 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750729AbZFEHLJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 03:11:09 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kmap_types: convert most arches to a single header file Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 08:09:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.90 (Linux/2.6.30-5-generic; KDE/4.2.85; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Mike Frysinger , Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky , Bryan Wu , Mikael Starvik , Hirokazu Takata , Luck Tony , Geert Uytterhoeven , Ralf Baechle , David Howells , Kyle McMartin , Martin Schwidefsky , Paul Mundt , "David S. Miller" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Russell King References: <4A280BB0.4030805@oracle.com> <200906042228.36571.arnd@arndb.de> <4A28539B.5050200@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <4A28539B.5050200@oracle.com> X-Face: I@=L^?./?$U,EK.)V[4*>`zSqm0>65YtkOe>TFD'!aw?7OVv#~5xd\s,[~w]-J!)|%=]> =?utf-8?q?+=0A=09=7EohchhkRGW=3F=7C6=5FqTmkd=5Ft=3FLZC=23Q-=60=2E=60Y=2Ea=5E?= =?utf-8?q?3zb?=) =?utf-8?q?+U-JVN=5DWT=25cw=23=5BYo0=267C=26bL12wWGlZi=0A=09=7EJ=3B=5Cwg?= =?utf-8?q?=3B3zRnz?=,J"CT_)=\H'1/{?SR7GDu?WIopm.HaBG=QYj"NZD_[zrM\Gip^U MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200906050809.09856.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18Xh74oUqYfq+28hZQ3CJOHcOCiVDmx5sK9/WA x/f4D+yfriynJdAO9QeSxWPXl/z/hzrDbBGBp/I0uWiAVUCmve YOSRP8lZqVm24zCsNId18URAtEJhDPL Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 973 Lines: 23 On Friday 05 June 2009, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > 1. The patch still conflicts with mine from the asm-generic > > tree. Yours is better in multiple ways (cleans up all the > > archs, adds the necessary types for ppc and arm), so should > > I drop mine now? I guess I can also make my file identical > > to yours so independent of who gets in first, there should be > > a clean merge? > > or you can take my patch into your asm-generic patchset. :) I've thought about that, but for 2.6.31, I'd like to only do the first half of adding ~50 files to include/asm-generic/, and then work with the arch maintainers on the second half, removing the code from their directories for 2.6.32, so this doesn't fit that well. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/