Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 11:43:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 11:43:00 -0500 Received: from [66.30.136.189] ([66.30.136.189]:25610 "HELO kullstam.ne.mediaone.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 11:42:57 -0500 From: "Johan Kullstam" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: multiprocessor kernel problem In-Reply-To: <3A27D871.6CE7638B@lanl.gov> Organization: none Date: 02 Dec 2000 11:15:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: Roger Crandell's message of "Fri, 01 Dec 2000 09:57:21 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Roger Crandell writes: > I should have mentioned this is a 4 processor machine with a 64 bit > buss. perhaps the netfilter stuff isn't 4-way SMP safe. my quad ppro box seizes with iptables too. however, many people report it working with 2-way SMP boxen. has anyone gotten netfilter/iptables to work on a SMP box with more than 2 processors? i recall old 2.0.x kernels deadlocking on a 4-way until x=35 or so. maybe this is somehow similar. -- J o h a n K u l l s t a m [kullstam@ne.mediaone.net] Don't Fear the Penguin! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/