Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 18:48:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 18:48:31 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:6672 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 18:48:22 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 20:48:02 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Robert Love Cc: Dieter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=FCtzel?= , Linux Kernel List , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: latency & real-time-ness. In-Reply-To: <1015266757.15277.4.camel@phantasy> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4 Mar 2002, Robert Love wrote: > If rmap finds its way into 2.5, I and others have some ideas about ways > to optimize the algorithms to reduce lock hold time and benefit from > preemption. For example, Daniel Phillips has some ideas wrt > zap_page_range. Feel free to help resolve these issues before rmap code gets merged. I'd prefer to be able to introduce rmap in small bits and pieces without breaking anything. regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/