Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753519AbZFFR6w (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jun 2009 13:58:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752641AbZFFR6l (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jun 2009 13:58:41 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]:23012 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752218AbZFFR6k (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jun 2009 13:58:40 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=nnhnkvURA6fudPi2Q8+cR3uxTh4MhqNsll/49hYdBmrByyVj7YVU7O36ZcWsLoJdWx QeGdZS1gvaEUD+xKoYKg4vuhf9DXy3CokCPOHYfbSu7YKfIH1NUjaV8L+snuyToyBD7W 9/5MvjZ3WFzA/ErWxISQStVjUd8WlilN8iMQk= Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 19:58:36 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ide-tape: fix flags Message-ID: <20090606175836.GA12865@liondog.tnic> Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1243926308-32385-1-git-send-email-petkovbb@gmail.com> <200906052034.06668.bzolnier@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200906052034.06668.bzolnier@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1058 Lines: 26 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:34:06PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Tuesday 02 June 2009 09:05:06 Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Hi Bart, > > > > those fix a stupid flags misuse that got spotted by Jiri Slaby. Please > > pay special attention to the first patch. FWIW, those can go as hot > > fixes right away and we might catch 30-rc8 since it's not out yet. > > The problem is that patches seem to be against ide-2.6.git/for-next... Sh*t, this is hitting the broken buffer allocation that Tejun removed (I'm getting the same OOM-kill as the one Tejun's mentioning here http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=124191711928890) so even with those patches, ide-tape is still broken. I'm guessing backport all of Tejun's ide-tape cleanup stuff after Linus pulls them into 31-rc1? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/