Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755502AbZFHVQq (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:16:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750909AbZFHVQj (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:16:39 -0400 Received: from mk-filter-1-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.100.52]:56263 "EHLO mk-filter-1-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750794AbZFHVQj (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:16:39 -0400 X-Trace: 212042182/mk-filter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/79.69.76.204/None/hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 79.69.76.204 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk X-SMTP-AUTH: X-MUA: X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtEEADIcLUpPRUzM/2dsb2JhbACBT80WhAoF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,326,1241391600"; d="scan'208";a="212042182" Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:05:51 +0100 (BST) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@sister.anvils To: Izik Eidus cc: Hugh Dickins , aarcange@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, chrisw@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm] ksm: stop scan skipping pages In-Reply-To: <4A2D70BF.9090605@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <1242261048-4487-1-git-send-email-ieidus@redhat.com> <4A2D4D9F.8080103@redhat.com> <4A2D70BF.9090605@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1536 Lines: 37 On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Izik Eidus wrote: > Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > > By the time Andrew sends KVM to Linus, it shouldn't be the > > patches currently in mmotm with more on top: > > So you want a repost of all the patchs? Will do eventually. In the same way that Andrew merges fixes to patches into the patches before sending to Linus. But in this case, rather large pieces would vanish in such a process, plus it would be unfair to expect Andrew to do that work; so it would be better for you to submit replacements when we're ready. > in that case any value to keep this > stuff in Andrew tree right now? I guess that depends on whether it's actually receiving any testing or review while it's in there. I'm happy for it to remain there for now - and the core of it is going to remain unchanged or only trivially changed. Really a matter for you to decide with Andrew: I don't want to pull it out of circulation myself. > Wouldnt it speed our development if we will keep it outside, > and then repost the whole thing? I don't see that having a version there in mmotm will slow us down (what could slow me down more than myself ;-?). But you and Andrew are free to decide it's counterproductive to keep the current version there, that's okay by me if you prefer to pull it. Hugh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/