Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758932AbZFILOn (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 07:14:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753197AbZFILOc (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 07:14:32 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:56855 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751786AbZFILOb (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 07:14:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:14:32 +0200 From: Nick Piggin To: Andi Kleen Cc: hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk, riel@redhat.com, chris.mason@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [13/16] HWPOISON: The high level memory error handler in the VM v5 Message-ID: <20090609111432.GL14820@wotan.suse.de> References: <20090603846.816684333@firstfloor.org> <20090603184648.2E2131D028F@basil.firstfloor.org> <20090609095155.GA14820@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090609095155.GA14820@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2492 Lines: 59 On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:51:55AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:46:47PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > +static int me_pagecache_clean(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn) > > +{ > > + struct address_space *mapping; > > + > > + if (!isolate_lru_page(p)) > > + page_cache_release(p); > > + > > + /* > > + * Now truncate the page in the page cache. This is really > > + * more like a "temporary hole punch" > > + * Don't do this for block devices when someone else > > + * has a reference, because it could be file system metadata > > + * and that's not safe to truncate. > > + */ > > + mapping = page_mapping(p); > > + if (mapping && S_ISBLK(mapping->host->i_mode) && page_count(p) > 1) { > > + printk(KERN_ERR > > + "MCE %#lx: page looks like a unsupported file system metadata page\n", > > + pfn); > > + return FAILED; > > + } > > page_count check is racy. Hmm, S_ISBLK should handle xfs's private mapping. > AFAIK btrfs has a similar private mapping but a quick grep does not show > up S_IFBLK anywhere, so I don't know what the situation is there. > > Unfortunately though, the linear mapping is not the only metadata mapping > a filesystem might have. Many work on directories in seperate mappings > (ext2, for example, which is where I first looked and will still oops with > your check). > > Also, others may have other interesting inodes they use for metadata. Do > any of them go through the pagecache? I dont know. The ext3 journal, > for example? How does that work? > > Unfortunately I don't know a good way to detect regular data mappings > easily. Ccing linux-fsdevel. Until that is worked out, you'd need to > use the safe pagecache invalidate rather than unsafe truncate. Maybe just testing S_ISREG would be better. Definitely safer than ISBLK. Note that for !ISREG files, then you can still attempt the non-destructive invalidate (after extracting a suitable function similarly to the truncate one). Most likely the fs is not using the page right now, so it should give bit more coverage. I still don't exactly know about, say, ext3 journal. Probably it doesn't use pagecache anyway. Do any other filesystems do crazy things with S_ISREG files? They probably deserve to oops if they do ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/