Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757263AbZFIQX4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 12:23:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755400AbZFIQXt (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 12:23:49 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:59226 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754495AbZFIQXs (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 12:23:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 12:22:55 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert To: lkml@morethan.org Cc: Harald Welte , Linus Torvalds , Duane Griffin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dave Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: Enable acpi-cpufreq driver for VIA/Centaur CPUs Message-ID: <20090609122255.147b680a@dhcp-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <200906090726.14187.lkml@morethan.org> References: <20090609021551.GG4455@prithivi.gnumonks.org> <200906090726.14187.lkml@morethan.org> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 656 Lines: 16 On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 07:26:11 -0500 "Michael S. Zick" wrote: > > Sounds fine with me. But what I would definitely suggest merging before 2.6.30 > > is the marking e_powersaver EXPERIMENTAL + DANGEROUS patch. > > > > As posted somewhere in this thread, > the acpi-cpufreq controller appears to work on my machine in initial tests. It works great on the Samsung NC20 with an x86_64 kernel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/