Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:52:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob van der Heij <rvdheij@gmail.com>,
       Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] NOHZ vs. profile/oprofile v2
In-Reply-To: <20090603152223.083010123@de.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0906092252150.3351@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20090603152223.083010123@de.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 685
Lines: 20

On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:

> Greetings,
> version 2 of the profile patches. The only change is the in_interrupt()
> fix in tick_nohz_stop_idle(). I would like to know how to proceed with
> the issue.
> Andy, do you still prefer to handle the old style profiler analog to
> the oprofile patch? If yes I would drop patch #1 and extend patch #2
> with another tick_nohz_disable().

Any update on this one ?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/