Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 11:35:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 11:35:11 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:62989 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 11:35:00 -0500 Message-ID: <3C84F449.8090404@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 08:37:29 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Organization: Transmeta Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010801 X-Accept-Language: en, sv, no, da, es, fr, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Dike CC: Benjamin LaHaise , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Arch option to touch newly allocated pages In-Reply-To: <200203051443.JAA02111@ccure.karaya.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Dike wrote: > hpa@zytor.com said: > >>This is not necessarily a bad thing, however. If the user hadn't set >>up enough swap, they're probably better off getting the error message >>early. >> > > This is not a situation in which a lack of swap or a lack of RAM is a problem. > > The problem is a tmpfs filling up. > > You think that UML refusing to run if it can't get every bit of memory it > might ever need is preferable to UML running fine in somewhat less memory? > Actually, yes, esp. since the only case you have been able to bring up is one of the sysadmin being a moron. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/