Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756778AbZFJCQA (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:16:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752171AbZFJCPy (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:15:54 -0400 Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.193]:47724 "EHLO tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752065AbZFJCPx (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:15:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4A2F1741.8090100@ct.jp.nec.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:15:29 +0900 From: Kiyoshi Ueda User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jens Axboe CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, device-mapper development , "Jun'ichi Nomura" , Boaz Harrosh , k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com Subject: Re: [PATCH block#for-2.6.31] block: add request clone interface References: <4A2E1490.7060902@ct.jp.nec.com> <20090609180344.GQ11363@kernel.dk> In-Reply-To: <20090609180344.GQ11363@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1345 Lines: 41 Hi Jens, On 06/10/2009 03:03 AM +0900, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09 2009, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote: >> Hi Jens, >> >> +/* >> + * Copy request information of the original request to the clone request. >> + */ >> +static void __blk_rq_prep_clone(struct request *dst, struct request *src) >> +{ >> + dst->cpu = src->cpu; >> + dst->cmd_flags = (rq_data_dir(src) | REQ_NOMERGE); >> + dst->cmd_type = src->cmd_type; >> + dst->__sector = blk_rq_pos(src); >> + dst->__data_len = blk_rq_bytes(src); >> + dst->nr_phys_segments = src->nr_phys_segments; >> + dst->ioprio = src->ioprio; >> + dst->buffer = src->buffer; >> + dst->cmd_len = src->cmd_len; >> + dst->cmd = src->cmd; > > Are you making sure that 'src' always exists while 'dst' is alive? Yes. Request-based dm is the owner of 'src' (original) and it never frees 'src' until the 'dst' (clone) are completed. I avoided deep-copying __cmd/buffer/sense as it's costly (additional allocation and memcpy). And I don't think there are any needs for that. But if anyone really wants that even with the copying cost, please speak up. Thanks, Kiyoshi Ueda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/