In-Reply-To: <200906091837.28897.arnd@arndb.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
       Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
       Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14] score - New architecure port to SunplusCT S+CORE
Message-ID: <OF02E4B434.8757FEB7-ON482575D1.000B2BB7-482575D1.000CB7AE@sunplusct.com>
From: liqin.chen@sunplusct.com
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:14:34 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Length: 1891
Lines: 50

Thanks Arnd, tglx, Sam and all who pay attention to score code.

We will update score arch code to catch up the 
linux/kernel code level. The next patches will
send out soon.

Best Regards
liqin

--


Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> д?? 2009-06-10 00:37:28:

> On Monday 08 June 2009, liqin.chen@sunplusct.com wrote:
> > Thanks Arnd, our MIS help me solve the download problem.
> > 
> > > Feel free to base you code on top of asm-generic.git#next, but tell 
me
> > > when you intend to do that so I can warn you of possibly rebases.
> > 
> > Last week, I had updated score code base on asm-generic.git#next.
> > 
> > and I will apply a account on kernel.org, But before I get the 
account,
> > can you let score code merge in asm-generic.git?
> 
> I can take your patches and apply them to a new branch in my tree
> if that helps. I hope that Linus can pull my tree early in the
> merge window so your architecture port and the microblaze changes
> based on it can also get in soon.
> 
> I guess for the new architecture, it makes sense to combine all
> your patches into a single changeset in git, since they don't
> make sense until you have the complete set, and your changeset
> comments are rather boring so far anyway.
> 
> Can you write a few paragraphs of text about your architecture
> for the initial changeset comment? I think it would be good
> to permanently store some facts in there, e.g. in which ways
> the architecture is different from others, where to get a
> toolchain and what kinds of hardware exist for it.
> 
> I'll go through the patches once more and see if I find anything
> that should still be changed before the code goes in, but
> from a brief look, the code looks pretty good now.
> 
>    Arnd <><

????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m????????????I?