Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 11:59:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 11:58:50 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:62222 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 11:58:21 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [RFC] Arch option to touch newly allocated pages Date: 5 Mar 2002 08:57:41 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20020304232806.A31622@redhat.com> <200203051443.JAA02119@ccure.karaya.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2002 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: <200203051443.JAA02119@ccure.karaya.com> By author: Jeff Dike In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > The other reason I don't like this is that, at some point, I'd like to > start thinking about userspace cooperating with the kernel on memory > management. UML looks like a perfect place to start since it's essentially > identical to the host making it easier for the two to bargain over memory. > > Having UML react sanely to unbacked pages is a step in that direction, having > UML preemptively grab all the memory it could ever use isn't. > Until you can come up with a sane application for it, this is just featuritis. -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/