Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 12:08:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 12:07:53 -0500 Received: from 216-42-72-143.ppp.netsville.net ([216.42.72.143]:46253 "EHLO roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 12:07:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 12:06:43 -0500 From: Chris Mason To: Hans Reiser , Oliver.Schersand@BASF-IT-Services.com cc: Alessandro Suardi , use-oracle@suse.com, suse-linux-e@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Antwort: Re: Kernel Hangs 2.4.16 on heay io Oracle and Tivolie TSM Message-ID: <322850000.1015348003@tiny> In-Reply-To: <3C838DA7.4050807@namesys.com> In-Reply-To: <3C838DA7.4050807@namesys.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.0 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, March 04, 2002 06:07:19 PM +0300 Hans Reiser wrote: > Wasn't 2.4.16 the known unstable vm release of 2.4? Why do you go to > such effort to stick with a bad kernel? Go to 2.4.18. I'm not sure exactly which vm problems you mean, but He's running the suse 2.4.16, which is heavily patched. When your running big production databases, upgrading to the kernel of the week isn't an option. I think we've found the bug, it looks like a race in the proc code. Oliver, someone will contact you a little later with instructions on getting a kernel with the fix. If you only see this oops during backups, make sure you aren't trying to backup /proc. -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/