Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758590AbZFJLzo (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:55:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758293AbZFJLza (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:55:30 -0400 Received: from mx-out2.daemonmail.net ([216.104.160.39]:46550 "EHLO mx-out2.daemonmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757273AbZFJLz3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:55:29 -0400 From: "Michael S. Zick" Reply-To: lkml@morethan.org To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86: cpu_debug support for VIA / Centaur CPU's Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:55:27 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Harald Welte , Jaswinder Singh Rajput , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de References: <20090609082931.GD25316@prithivi.gnumonks.org> <200906100611.14941.lkml@morethan.org> <20090610111352.GA4482@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090610111352.GA4482@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906100655.29833.lkml@morethan.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1994 Lines: 59 On Wed June 10 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Michael S. Zick wrote: > > > On Wed June 10 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > > > > > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > > > > MSRs should really be enumerated along CPU features. They will be > > > > > accessed if a CPU offers that CPU feature. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nice in theory, but so many MSRs have to be enumerated with obscure test > > > > combinations, that it really isn't practical in the general case. That > > > > is why we have the safe MSR variants. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, the safe read should never fault - there should be all > > > > > zeroes or an error return. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Error return, MSRs #GP if not present. All zero means a present > > > > MSR (which is zero.) > > > > > > yes, of course - i meant the /debug/x86/cpu/* behavior: it should > > > either result zeroes, or should return -EINVAL. (probably the > > > latter) > > > > > > > Return zeroes - same as hardware case for bits which can't be set. > > Returning -EINVAL might match a specific bit pattern caller is > > looking for. > > these files are accessed via read(). The -EINVAL is the syscall > return value. The value (if any) goes into the buffer that is being > read into. So there's no way to 'match a specific bit pattern' - > it's two separate spaces. > Right. Prior post was just a bad case of nerves. ;) Mike > Ingo > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/